They say there are major shortages in DS's and PS2's contributed to the lower than normal numbers.
MS and the 360 was at 16 million consoles sold in the same time frame that the PS3 has sold 20 million. Yet despite this fact, the journalists of today pick at the PS3 as if it is a total failure. The irony here is that in saying the PS3 is a failure, they inadvertently are saying the 360 is a failure... Interesting.
He brought balance to the site. Since then the only folks there have been the MS fanboys he left behind... And your defending the site most certainly says something about you.
A site that has both Sony and MS fanboys is better than one with only a single side or view.
It's ironic that Ripten then adds to this hype by writing a letter to all about not hyping KZ2... Oh the drama ensues.
And seriously, anybody that takes Ripten to heart needs a heart transplant.
You get the disagree's because you are a known MS troll here trying to bash a game that nearly 100% of the gaming journalists that have previewed it have given the AI extremely high remarks. Your opinion means nothing since it is tainted with the fanboy glasses you wear. Now please, take this as a bit of friendly advice and grow up, release that fanboy in you and never let him back in. Until then, expect to be known as a trolling fanboy for the MS camps.
So this is what I can expect when I see the game for the first time? Cool.
How many times will this pathetic flame bait of an article get refreshed to the front page of N4G?
Sad... Troll.
Maybe they should have just added some mode where they send wave after wave of Helghast after ya? Maybe that would have titillated your senses? lol
Good gravy, COD4 did not have any silly gimicky co-op modes and it was GOTY. Imagine that...
That when reading the article, it would read like a full 10 out of 10 game but then I read the final score and wondered why they held back... It's not a bad score at all but I wonder why the 9 and not the 10? Would have hurt to go full out 10 or is this just an attempt to spark up some debate? Just wonder...
I have never looked back. The system is the best value and bang for the buck to those of us that want a total package. Saying that is not a slam on any other system, it is simply saying something nice about the PS3.
What am I saying!? It's always sounded this awesome!
Sarcasm or not, comments like that are what make the gaming zone a collection of trash talkers and is completely unnecessary.
If a web site is simply posting up FUD for hits or if they actually believe this kind of silly sentiment. Seriously, the PS3 is tracking nearly as well as the PS2 and is twice the price. It has sold more year on year than the 360 did yet is considered a failure... If the PS3 in terms of sales is such a failure, then what would you call the 360? I personally would say that the 360 is a success and therefore the PS3 is heading towards success as it is selling in the same manner. Articles like t...
So tell me, how many other FPS's have you played that were more than 8 hours long? Not to mention, stating the hours a game will last is a relative statement since we all play differently...
Can you name top quality FPS's that run for more than 8 hours?
No shock that you look at the score rather than read the quotes. Here, let me help all the illiterates out there that feel the need to follow the scores rather than read the reviews...
"Sony’s flagship shooter pwns all’. Indeed, in the ‘info box’ they say the game is like ‘Call of Duty set in double-gravity space, directed by Ridley Scott and rendered by God."
Reading that alone makes me happy to know I am a gamer and not some stupid fanboy that would d...
It's as if this thread has been attacked by the troll brigade. For god sakes folks, let's all remember why we play games... For games, not consoles. Idiots play consoles and troll, gamers play games despite the console and then talk shop in a mature manner. Don't be an idiot folks.
Yeah, and that's why there are a plethora of news articles proving how the PS3's have such a high failure rate...
/sarcasm
Nobody will take you seriously if you spread lies all the time.
How much time Naughty Dog had to spend on Uncharted to polish it up and get it out for retail? I imagine that since it looked better than TR, they must have spent more time and that is a simple result of publishers not pushing the developers. If publishers kept their greedy hands out of the development process, games would not end up like TR:Underworld.
just about to say the same thing